Enforcement of CCMA default awards New case law

CCMA certification of an award found to be ultra vires.

The Labour Court recently considered the effect of the amendments to the LRA and in particular the application of s143 and held that the certification of an award followed by its execution through the Sheriff is ultra vires. Accordingly, s143 does not give the CCMA with jurisdiction to issue writs of execution and as such these must still be issued by the Labour Court.

The two matters were MBS Transport CC vs CCMA and 3 Others J1807/15 (‘the MBS application’) and the other being Bheka Management Services vs Kekana and 2 Others J1706/15 (‘the Bheka application’).

The applicants approached the Labour Court on an urgent basis to stay the writs of execution, which the CCMA had certified, pending reviews of the CCMA awards.

The Labour Court considered the relevant provisions of the amendments to the LRA as contained in s143, and which read as follows:

  • Section 143(1) “An Arbitration Award issued by a Commissioner is final and binding and it may be enforced as if it were an order of the Labour Court in respect of which a writ has been issued, unless it is an advisory Arbitration Award”;
  • Section 143(3) “An Arbitration Award may only be enforced in terms of subsection (1) if the director has certified that the Arbitration Award is an Award contemplated in subsection 1”; and
  • Section 143(5) “Despite subsection (1), an Arbitration Award in terms of which a party is required to pay an amount of money, must be treated for the purposes of enforcing or executing that Award, as if it were an Order of the Magistrates Court.” (our emphasis)

In determining the matter, Phatshoane AJ made the following relevant observations:

  • over the years, writs of execution were issued by the Registrar of the Labour Court before they could be executed by the Sheriff and as such, the Labour Court had in terms of s145(3) of the LRA, judiciously exercised its discretion to stay these writs where there was a pending review;
  • furthermore, that the LRA Amendments to s143 had changed the situation wherein the CCMA could now issue writs for the enforcement of its own arbitration awards however, that the certification of an award by the CCMA did not convert the award into an order of the Labour Court, despite the legislative wording;
  • that s143(5) creates confusion given that an arbitration award which orders the payment of money must be treated for the purposes of enforcing or executing that award, as if it were an order of the Magistrates Court; and
  • that clause 19.1.8 of the CCMA’s Practice and Procedure Manual states that, ‘Once an Award is certified, it can be executed upon delivery to the Sheriff and in terms of the LRA Amendments of 2014, and as such there is no need to approach the Labour Court for a writ to be issued first’. (Our emphasis.)

The Labour Court held that the CCMA did not have the statutory authority to issue writs and furthermore that the certification of an award followed by its execution through the Sheriff is in fact ultra vires.

Accordingly, s143 does not give the CCMA with jurisdiction to issue writs of execution and as such these must still be issued by the Labour Court. On this basis, there was no reason to stay the writs issued by the CCMA as they were a nullity and fell to be set aside.

No doubt, in light of these decisions the legislature will enact a further amendment to the LRA.

Leave a reply

fifteen − two =

Copyright © 2018 Bregmans | Designed By Right Click Media | Privacy Policy | Tel: +27 (0)11 646-0335 | E-mail: info@bmalaw.co.za